The Truth about Cellulose Insulation
Click here to see the video
This recall involves two models of torch handles that were sold under the Lincoln Electric® and Harris Products Group® brand names. The torch handles are used in welding. They are gold in color and made out of brass. Welding torch model numbers include 18-5 and 85. Manufacture date codes include FM, GA, GB and GC. The model number and date code are stamped on the torch handle at the end closest to the flame. The torch handles were sold individually and also as part of the following kits. Units with “0” above the word “Harris” and to the right of the rivet head are not included in this recall.
See full article at CPSC
In the new issue of NFPA Journal®, President Jim Shannon said the Association will focus on the leading causes of home fires, including cooking. "We also need to continue to push hard for home fire sprinklers. That's still a large priority for NFPA, and we plan to work very aggressively in 2014 on our residential sprinkler initiative," he said.
The following is a response by a CCAI member regarding the Electrolux Dryer Fire article that was posted on July 8, 2014.
I appeared in Federal Court in San Diego this year as the plaintiff’s witness in a subrogation case against Electrolux dryers. The fire occurred in Fallbrook, CA 2008. It involved a two story single family residence with the washer and dryer located on the second floor. I was called to the scene to investigate the fire.
When I arrived, the Electrolux dryer was in the front yard and the top had been opened by the fire department. I did my usual exterior and interior inspection and arrived at the laundry room. The fire was confined to envelopment of the laundry room; with smoke damage extending out the laundry room door.
I inspected the room for all signs of ignition and found none. I looked at the dryer exhaust. I interview the insured and proceeded to the front lawn to inspect the dryer.
The dryer had very defined plum and burn patterns indicating the area of the fire’s origin within the dryer. The Electrolux dryer cannot be accessed from the rear and therefore I did not remove any interior parts. I took all necessary photographs.
The adjuster was on hand, and we discussed removal and storage of the dryer. The adjuster said he would take charge of the dryer and make arrangements for storage.
When I was in trial, the defense attacked me, because I did not take photographs of the dryer exhaust on the side of the residence, second story. Further, I did not photograph the interior of the exhaust line to see if it was plugged with lint. I testified that the dryer exhaust opening, within the laundry room, appeared to be clear. I testified that the dryer was the area of origin, and something within the dryer was the ignition source. Not good enough.
The defense’s position was that the insured did not call a professional and have the lint removed; the dryer would need to be dissembled. They also contended that the exhaust line may have been plugged with lint and thus lint backed up within the dryer further adding fuel and ultimately igniting. The jury did not find enough evidence to suggest a design flaw with the dryer and therefore ruled in favor of Electrolux.
The trial I was in marks the fifth trial that Electrolux has won. They claim the design of the dryer does not cause fires. I strongly suggest that if anyone is investigating a dryer fire and especially Electrolux, be prepared to run a camera snake the full length of the exhaust line and take as much of the exhaust line as possible to be preserved as evidence along with the dryer. In this case, I could not have taken the exhaust line without tearing into the wall. However, even though the Electrolux dryer was the ignition source, the jury believed that Electrolux was not liable for the fire.
See Electrolux article here
Recall Date: July 10, 2014 Recall Number: 14-228
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Consumers should stop using this product unless otherwise instructed. It is illegal to resell or attempt to resell a recalled consumer product.
Name of Product: Power adaptor/chargers (promotional giveaway)
Hazard: The adaptors can overheat, posing a burn hazard.
Read full recall report at CPSC
Introduced by Representative Peter T. King
January 15, 2009
The following is from the Library of Congress - Thomas
National Bombing Prevention Act of 2009 - Amends the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish an Office for Bombing Prevention within the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Protective Security Coordination Division of the Office of Infrastructure Protection. Assigns the Office primary responsibility for enhancing the ability and coordinating the efforts of the nation to deter, detect, prevent, protect against, and respond to terrorist explosive attacks in the United States.
Directs the Secretary to partner with other federal, state, local, and tribal agencies, nonprofit organizations, universities, and the private sector to: (1) develop a pilot program that includes a domestic breeding program for explosives detection canines; (2) increase the number of capability assessments of explosives detection canine units; (3) continue development of a scientifically-based training curriculum to enhance consensus-based national training and certification standards to provide for the effective use of explosives detection canines; and (4) continue engagement in explosives detection canine research and development activities through partnerships with the Science and Technology Directorate and the Technical Support Working Group.
Directs the Secretary to develop and periodically update a national strategy to prevent and prepare for terrorist explosive attacks in the United States.
Directs the Secretary, acting through the Under Secretary for Science and Technology, to: (1) ensure coordination and information sharing regarding nonmilitary research, development, testing, and evaluation activities relating to the detection and prevention of, protection against, and response to terrorist attacks in the United States using explosives or improvised explosive devices and the development of tools and technologies necessary to neutralize and disable explosive devices; (2) coordinate with relevant federal department heads to ensure that military policies, procedures, activities, tools, and technologies to prevent and respond to terrorist attacks are adapted to nonmilitary uses; (3) establish a technology transfer program to facilitate the identification, modification, and commercialization of technology and equipment for use by agencies, emergency response providers, and the private sector against such attacks; and (4) establish a working group to advise and assist in the identification of military technologies developed by the Department of Defense (DOD) or the private sector to protect against and respond to explosive attacks.
Amends the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 to direct the Comptroller General to utilize explosives detection canine teams of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and other DHS agencies to strengthen security and capacity.
Directs the Secretary to submit a report to specified congressional committees on the administration of canine procurement activities by DHS to deter, prevent, detect, and protect against terrorist explosive attacks in the United States that includes consideration of the feasibility of reducing the price paid for the procurement of untrained canines."
Copyright© 2010. California Conference of Arson Investigators. SiteAdmin. Web Design by Todd Lando