WASHINGTON, D.C. – The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced today that Gree Electric Appliances Inc., of Zhuhai, China; Hong Kong Gree Electric Appliances Sales Co. Ltd., of Hong Kong; and Gree USA Sales Ltd., of City of Industry, Calif., have agreed to pay a $15.45 million civil penalty to the government.
The penalty settles charges that Gree:
Barber v. State
Georgia Court of Appeals, Criminal Case (10/26/2012, 11/5/2012) A12A1624
CRIMINAL PRACTICE: Arson, Accident, Jury Charges, Intent, Insurance Fraud
Alert: The statute defining first degree arson, OCGA § 16-7-60 (a) (3), does not require that the accused set the fire with the intent to defraud the insurer, only that the accused knowingly damage[d] by fire or explosive any insured dwelling without the insured's consent.
Headnote: The Court of Appeals affirmed Kelvin D. Barber Jr.'s conviction for first degree arson, as the evidence supported it. The Court held that the trial court did not erred in failing to charge the jury on Barber's sole defense of accident. Barber argued that he did not have the requisite intent under OCGA § 16-7-60 (a) (3) because he set the fire in order to commit suicide, not to burn or damage the house or cause loss to the insurer. He further argued that the evidence was insufficient to show that he set the fire knowing it would spread to or cause damage to other parts of the house. But the Court explained that § 16-7-60 (a) (3) does not require that the accused set the fire with the intent to defraud the insurer, only that the accused knowingly damage[d] any insured dwelling without the insured's consent by fire or explosive. Here, the evidence, including Barber's statement to the fire investigators, showed that Barber: poured gasoline and lighter fluid throughout the house and garage, and not just on his person, ripped up books and papers and spread them throughout the upper levels of the house as well, and told investigators that he intended for the house to burn, in addition to the vehicle he was inside. Barber also argued that the trial court should have charged the jury on his sole defense of accident, arguing that there was at least slight evidence to warrant the charge. But the Court found that the trial court's charge, given pursuant to Barber's request at trial, included the accident theory of defense.
From Out of the Abyss...
This week's article is from the June 1950 Vol V, No. 5 issue of the California Conference of Arson Investigators newsletter and was written by Lowell W. Bradford.
Physical Evidence Aspects of Fire Investigation
Bugatti is recalling certain model year 2006-208 Veyron vehicles manufactured October 3, 2006, to December 22, 2006. In the affected vehicles, the positive battery (B+) cable and the connection to the alternator may corrode.
The corrosion may result in the battery positive cable overheating, increasing the risk of a fire.
Click here for details.
This recall involves Ryobi 40-Volt Brushless Snow Blowers. Item number RY40802 is printed on the data label on the back of the blowers. The snow blowers are black and green with two LED lights located on the front of the unit and are approximately 22 inches wide by 43 inches tall. “RYOBI” is printed on the front of the snow blowers. The models included in this recall are RY40802, RY40802A and RY40822. The model numbers are printed on the packaging. “40 V” is printed on each side of the snow blowers.
Go to CPSC for more details.
Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC (Jaguar) is recalling certain model year 2010 Jaguar XF vehicles manufactured December 17, 2008, to April 15, 2009. The affected vehicles have a fuel tank with an outlet flange that may crack, allowing fuel to leak onto the ground.
A fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source may increase the risk of a fire.
Introduced by Assembly Member Lieu
February 25, 2009
The following is from
AB 625, as amended, Lieu. Novelty lighters. Existing law requires the State Fire Marshal to specify standards for the design of cigarette lighters. Existing law prohibits a person from selling, offering for sale, or distributing a cigarette lighter that does not comply with those standards. A violation of these provisions is an
infraction. This bill would, in addition, prohibit a person, including a manufacturer, distributor, importer, or retailer, from selling, offering for sale, distributing, or offering for promotion an operable novelty lighter. The bill would define a novelty lighter as a mechanical or electrical device, operating on any type of fuel, that is typically used for lighting cigarettes, cigars, or pipes and that (1) is designed to appear to be a toy, (2) has entertaining audio or visual effects, or (3) resembles
in physical form or function articles commonly recognized as appealing
to, or intended for use by, persons under 18 12 years of age. The bill
would exempt from these provisions a device that is (1) manufactured
before January 1, 1980, (2) incapable of being fueled or lacking a means
of combustion, (3) used primarily to ignite fuel for fireplaces or grills,
or (4) printed or decorated with logos, labels, decals, artwork, or heat
shrinkable sleeves. A violation of this prohibition would be an infraction.
A full description of the bill is at:
Copyright© 2010. California Conference of Arson Investigators. SiteAdmin. Web Design by Todd Lando