4th_of_July3
image image image image image image

The Truth about Cellulose Insulation

Click here to see the video

Description:

This recall involves two models of torch handles that were sold under the Lincoln Electric® and Harris Products Group® brand names. The torch handles are used in welding. They are gold in color and made out of brass. Welding torch model numbers include 18-5 and 85. Manufacture date codes include FM, GA, GB and GC. The model number and date code are stamped on the torch handle at the end closest to the flame.  The torch handles were sold individually and also as part of the following kits.  Units with “0” above the word “Harris” and to the right of the rivet head are not included in this recall.

See full article at CPSC

Recall date: JULY 17, 2014
Recall number: 14-233

Name of product:
USB car charger adapters, power adapters and 8-pin charger cables.
Hazard:
Improperly mounted plug blades, and inadequate electronic circuitry create a fire and electrical shock hazard to consumers.
See full article at CPSC

In the new issue of NFPA Journal®, President Jim Shannon said the Association will focus on the leading causes of home fires, including cooking. "We also need to continue to push hard for home fire sprinklers. That's still a large priority for NFPA, and we plan to work very aggressively in 2014 on our residential sprinkler initiative," he said.

Read more...

The following is a response by a  CCAI member regarding the Electrolux Dryer Fire article that was posted on July 8, 2014.

 

I appeared in Federal Court in San Diego this year as the plaintiff’s witness in a subrogation case against Electrolux dryers.  The fire occurred in Fallbrook, CA 2008.  It involved a two story single family residence with the washer and dryer located on the second floor.  I was called to the scene to investigate the fire.

When I arrived, the Electrolux dryer was in the front yard and the top had been opened by the fire department.  I did my usual exterior and interior inspection and arrived at the laundry room.  The fire was confined to envelopment of the laundry room; with smoke damage extending out the laundry room door.

I inspected the room for all signs of ignition and found none.  I looked at the dryer exhaust.  I interview the insured and proceeded to the front lawn to inspect the dryer.

The dryer had very defined plum and burn patterns indicating the area of the fire’s origin within the dryer.  The Electrolux dryer cannot be accessed from the rear and therefore I did not remove any interior parts.  I took all necessary photographs.

The adjuster was on hand, and we discussed removal and storage of the dryer.  The adjuster said he would take charge of the dryer and make arrangements for storage.

When I was in trial, the defense attacked me, because I did not take photographs of the dryer exhaust on the side of the residence, second story.  Further, I did not photograph the interior of the exhaust line to see if it was plugged with lint.  I testified that the dryer exhaust opening, within the laundry room, appeared to be clear.  I testified that the dryer was the area of origin, and something within the dryer was the ignition source.  Not good enough.

The defense’s position was that the insured did not call a professional and have the lint removed; the dryer would need to be dissembled.  They also contended that the exhaust line may have been plugged with lint and thus lint backed up within the dryer further adding fuel and ultimately igniting.  The jury did not find enough evidence to suggest a design flaw with the dryer and therefore ruled in favor of Electrolux.

The trial I was in marks the fifth trial that Electrolux has won.  They claim the design of the dryer does not cause fires.  I strongly suggest that if anyone is investigating a dryer fire and especially Electrolux, be prepared to run a camera snake the full length of the exhaust line and take as much of the exhaust line as possible to be preserved as evidence along with the dryer.  In this case, I could not have taken the exhaust line without tearing into the wall.  However, even though the Electrolux dryer was the ignition source, the jury believed that Electrolux was not liable for the fire.

See Electrolux article here

Recall Date: July 10, 2014
Recall Number: 14-228

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Consumers should stop using this product unless otherwise instructed.  It is illegal to resell or attempt to resell a recalled consumer product.

Name of Product: Power adaptor/chargers (promotional giveaway)

Hazard: The adaptors can overheat, posing a burn hazard.

Read full recall report at CPSC

Mendo-Lake Arson Roundtable: #16

Covering: Lake, Mendocino, upper Sonoma, upper Napa and Colusa (west of I-5) counties

Coordinator: Eric Smith
Phone: 707 293-3813 cell
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Upcoming Meetings: 

June 28, 2014
8:30 am to 4:00 pm
Instructor: Art Black

This is a one-day seminar on what a Fire Investigator needs to know about Fire Protection Systems to meet NFPA 1033 and NFPA 921 (2014 edition)

See flyer for details
Click here for the registration form
Banner

Location

1279 North White Avenue 
Pomona, California 91768 
Phone:  (909) 865-5004
Fax (909) 865-5024 
8:00 am - 5:00 pm 
Monday - Friday

 

 

coin-anim